File under: Obvious
So, Adam G thinks its wicked to abort baby girls just because they aren't boys, and babies with Down's Syndrome and babies that might be genetically predisposed to homosexuality. OK, so its kind of obvious Adam doesn't like abortion. Sure, he might approve of it under some extenuating circumstances (PLEASE DO NOT ASK HIM!!!), but in general its a bad thing. Got it.
OK, so what other wicked reasons for abortion has Adam missed? If we beat him to the punch, that will end his string of nearly identical utterly boring posts and end his Abortion Trilogy where it stands. Let's see:
- height
genetic predisposition to obesity
intelligence potential
hair color
genetic predisposition to 70's era music
excessive body hair
genetic predisposition to pretentious blog posts
blue eyes
P.S., in case you didn't know, all babies are born with blue eyes, so that last one isn't serious.
10 comments
For some reason the Monty Python song "Every Sperm Is Sacred" comes to mind.
Geez,
A T&Ser finally posts something readable and it's just whine, whine, whine.
Just never satisfied are we?
Seth R.
Rosalynde Welch had a good post recently. Actually, Nate Oman's Weimar post was pretty darn good too. Just my opinion.
Seth,
One sentence, repeated three times, makes it "readable"?
I have to repsecfully disagree with you about the Rosalynde post danithew.
Well ...
It makes so I can read it anyway...
Seth R.
Rarely in agreement with Seth, this isn't your best work Snarkette.
PS -- Steve EM's wife says her brown eyed babies were born with brown-grey eyes and only her blue eyed babies were born with blue eyes (that didn't change).
Antiprude hanging with Steve EM's family for the holiday weekend.
Anonymous, are you referring to the Rosalynd Welch post titled "Who Is My Neighbor?" What's not to like?
While I don't care for the posts themselves, I think the format is an improvement for Adam. By making his post basically just the title and then putting the actual content in a comment he is implicitly inviting discussion. Even better, he is actually participating in the discussion rather than running off and pouting when people ask questions that he can't/won't answer. This is a positive step, and I applaud him.
I kept waiting for the next step, which is discussing "what about if you could cure the condition?"
Do we get a movement, such as in the deaf community, that resists cures?
Which conditions should be cured and which should not be?
Post a Comment